W3 Partnership

Rethinking your iPaaS? Talk to the specialists who’ve seen it before.

W3 Partnership has done one thing since 2007: enterprise integration. It’s not a sideline or a product we bolted on — it’s our core business, and over nearly two decades we’ve seen and solved just about every integration problem there is. When you work with us you’re buying that expertise as much as the platform itself.

We were integration specialists long before we built a platform

We started as consultants — architects and engineers who lived and breathed integration and nothing else. That hasn’t changed. We still deliver integration consultancy alongside our Smarter Integration service, and if that’s what you need — an expert pair of hands on your own platform, an architecture review, a proof of concept — we’ll happily do it. Smarter Integration grew out of that consulting experience; it’s the distilled result of watching what works and what fails.

We know your platform — we’re often the ones called in to fix it

We’re regularly asked to rescue integration implementations that have stalled or gone wrong — including on the major iPaaS platforms. We know Boomi, MuleSoft and the rest: how they’re meant to work, where they get stuck, and the challenges teams hit running them. That familiarity means we can usually tell you quickly whether your problem is fixable where you are, or whether a different model would serve you better.

Is your iPaaS implementation struggling?

If you’ve lost faith in your current platform, talk to us. Two honest caveats up front:

  • If you’ve signed a large upfront licence or multi-year support agreement, we can’t make that disappear — but we can help you plan around it, run alongside it, or be ready for when it ends.
  • We’re looking for organisations that genuinely want a better way to deliver integration — not ammunition to negotiate with an incumbent. If you’re serious about an alternative, we’re the right call; if you just need leverage over Boomi or MuleSoft, we’re probably not.

Why we stand apart

It comes down to five connected things: our product (Smarter Integration, our own runtime — no third-party licence underneath), our experience (since 2007, integration only), our model (we sell, build, run and maintain it as one — the “fifth operating model”, where you stay out of the platform business), our TCO (typically around 4× lower over three years) and our speed (live in 3–6 months, not 12–18). More detail: how it works · pricing · the proof.

Privately held — and on your side

We’re privately owned and independent. There’s no private-equity owner pushing us to book revenue at any cost. That means we can do the thing a licence-driven vendor structurally can’t: tell you when we’re not the right answer. If Smarter Integration isn’t right for you, we won’t sell it to you.

Frequently asked questions

Yes — we are regularly asked to do exactly that, including on the major iPaaS platforms. We know Boomi, MuleSoft and the rest: how they are meant to work, where they get stuck, and the challenges teams hit running them. That familiarity means we can usually tell you quickly whether your problem is fixable where you are, or whether a different model would serve you better.

No. If you have signed a large upfront licence or a multi-year support agreement, we cannot make that disappear — but we can help you plan around it, run alongside it, or be ready for when it ends. We would rather say that honestly up front than pretend otherwise.

Either. We started as consultants and still deliver integration consultancy alongside our Smarter Integration service — so if what you need is an expert pair of hands on your own platform, an architecture review or a proof of concept, we will happily do that. If a different model would genuinely serve you better, we will say so.

Yes. We are looking for organisations that genuinely want a better way to deliver integration — not ammunition to negotiate with an incumbent. If you are serious about an alternative we are the right call; if you just need leverage over Boomi or MuleSoft, we are probably not. We are privately held, so there is no pressure to close a deal that is not right.